Vulnerability processing should ignore software without version (#14612)
#13615 - [X] Changes file added for user-visible changes in `changes/` or `orbit/changes/`. See [Changes files](https://fleetdm.com/docs/contributing/committing-changes#changes-files) for more information. - ~[ ] Documented any API changes (docs/Using-Fleet/REST-API.md or docs/Contributing/API-for-contributors.md)~ - ~[ ] Documented any permissions changes (docs/Using Fleet/manage-access.md)~ - ~[ ] Input data is properly validated, `SELECT *` is avoided, SQL injection is prevented (using placeholders for values in statements)~ - ~[ ] Added support on fleet's osquery simulator `cmd/osquery-perf` for new osquery data ingestion features.~ - [X] Added/updated tests - [X] Manual QA for all new/changed functionality - ~For Orbit and Fleet Desktop changes:~ - ~[ ] Manual QA must be performed in the three main OSs, macOS, Windows and Linux.~ - ~[ ] Auto-update manual QA, from released version of component to new version (see [tools/tuf/test](../tools/tuf/test/README.md)).~
This commit is contained in:
@@ -301,6 +301,8 @@ With a somewhat normalized list of software, in order to search CVEs for it, we
|
||||
|
||||
As described briefly above, we do this by translating the NVD database of CPEs into a [sqlite database that helps Fleet do the lookup of CPEs very quickly](https://github.com/fleetdm/nvd).
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: Software that was ingested with an empty `version` field will be ignored by the NVD vulnerability processing.
|
||||
|
||||
#### How accurate is this translation process?
|
||||
|
||||
This is the most error prone part of the process.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user